home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0559>
- <title>
- Nov. 29, 1993: Gumming Up The Works
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Nov. 29, 1993 Is Freud Dead?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- POLITICS, Page 34
- Gumming Up The Works
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>How a small but determined group of conservatives is ambushing
- Clinton's policymaking vanguard
- </p>
- <p>By Kevin Fedarko--Reported by Julie Johnson, Elaine Shannon and Bruce van Voorst/Washington
- </p>
- <p> The pounding was relentless. As the latest Clinton Administration
- nominee sat before the Senate Armed Services Committee last
- week, Senators took their turns delivering the blows. First,
- South Carolina's nonagenarian Strom Thurmond took up the cudgel,
- blustering about what he called "a compelling prima facie case
- that [Morton Halperin] is unsuited for any position in the
- Pentagon" and calling him a man of "deeply flawed judgment"
- who has failed "to create an impression of reliability or trustworthiness."
- Then John McCain of Arizona spoke of "profoundly disturbing
- questions about Halperin's judgment, his credibility, and his
- suitability to hold a position of responsibility.
- </p>
- <p> How did Halperin manage to get himself caught between the cross
- hairs of a confirmation hearing so savage it resembled a drive-by
- shooting? True, Halperin is a liberal icon whose career stretches
- from the Nixon Administration--he resigned in 1970 over the
- White House's policy on Cambodia--to Washington director of
- the American Civil Liberties Union. But it is his nomination
- to the Pentagon's newly created position in charge of peacekeeping
- operations abroad that has turned him into an object lesson
- in the way a band of conservative Congressmen, bureaucrats and
- ideological crusaders are using the Senate's confirmation process
- to wreak havoc with President Clinton's effort to create a new
- policymaking vanguard.
- </p>
- <p> Among the patchwork of right-wing alliances and interest groups
- currently yearning to take jabs at the Democrats, few stand
- in a better position to deliver a knockout punch than the Republican
- members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. And in Halperin,
- they have a target so enticing that Republican staff members
- privately refer to him as "the real, red meat."
- </p>
- <p> Over the years, Halperin's liberal views have achieved their
- most ardent expression in defense policy, a piece of hallowed
- conservative turf. Yet he used his position as a director of
- the A.C.L.U. to espouse such profoundly nonliberal campaigns
- as defending the constitutional rights of Oliver North, Lyn
- Nofziger and the conservative student writers at the Dartmouth
- Review.
- </p>
- <p> Despite such ideological balance, Halperin has suffered from
- a hit-and-run campaign by conservative ideologues, most notably
- Frank Gaffney, a former Reagan Pentagon official who has been
- firing off tirades at him since last June. From his berth at
- the right-wing Center for Security Policy, a private Washington
- research unit, Gaffney has sent streams of faxes showcasing
- a highly selective sampling of Halperin's writings to a list
- of 1,200 leading people in Washington.
- </p>
- <p> Last week, after months of enforced silence (nominees are prohibited
- from defending themselves until their hearings), Halperin was
- finally allowed to respond. He introduced his family (including
- his grandson, who promptly fell asleep) and then declared, "Charges
- have been made about my beliefs and activities which are simply
- false. They are, in some cases, made up out of whole cloth;
- in others, they result from wrenching sentences out of context
- and building tales around them."
- </p>
- <p> True or not, the tales have been effective. In the likely event
- that the committee will fail to vote before Congress recesses
- for the holidays, Clinton will be forced to decide whether to
- resubmit Halperin's name in January and risk yet another bruising
- battle. If previous White House behavior offers any guide, his
- nomination may be headed for the dustbin.
- </p>
- <p> Halperin is only the latest in a line of liberal Clinton nominees
- who have either been dumped outright or forced to sit on their
- hands while right-wing lawmakers fulminate and filibuster against
- their views. Roberta Achtenberg, Clinton's assistant secretary
- for fair housing, was kept from her job for months while North
- Carolina's Jesse Helms denounced her as a "showpiece of the
- homosexual movement." Meanwhile, Walter Dellinger, now an assistant
- Attorney General, was in limbo for six months because Helms
- and Lauch Faircloth, also of North Carolina, took offense at
- Dellinger's record of reasoned--though pointedly liberal--arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court.
- </p>
- <p> For all the disgust that Democrats express over the witch-hunt,
- the shoe could just as easily be on the other foot. Previous
- nominees Douglas Ginsburg and Robert Bork, who suffered equally
- vituperative attacks from the left, can attest to that. But
- the current campaign has been remarkably effective in preventing
- the Clinton Administration from getting policy initiatives off
- the ground.
- </p>
- <p> The implications for Halperin are ominous. "Is a small cabal
- of neoconservatives operating in the fashion of Joe McCarthy
- going to be allowed to scuttle the nomination of a truly first-rate
- and honorable candidate?" asks Jeremy Stone, president of the
- Federation of American scientists. In this case, the answer
- may be yes.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-